Key takeaways
- Alabama allows testimonials under Rule 7.2(l): a real client, disclosed payment, and the lawyer answers for the content.
- A testimonial that recites an outcome also counts as a result claim under Rules 7.1 and 7.2(m).
- Reviews you did not request, arrange, or shape are generally outside the rule. Reviews on your own site, or ones you can delete, are inside it.
- Never tie a reward to a positive review. Rule 7.2(h) and 16 CFR 465.4 both bar it.
- Reply to reviews without confirming the reviewer was a client. Rule 1.6 covers it.
Yes. Alabama lets a law firm publish client testimonials, but the rule that allows them sets conditions. This post covers those conditions, the reviews that fall outside them, and the federal rules that apply on top. This is a plain-language read of the rules, from the perspective of a marketing company that works in this industry - our founder has extensive legal experience but as you know, this is not legal advice. Run your final wording past your own counsel or your regulator.
What Rule 7.2(l) requires
Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2(l) is the testimonial rule. The Supreme Court of Alabama rewrote it in an order dated May 13, 2025, effective January 1, 2026. Read the current text in Rule 7.2. It sets three conditions:
- The testimonial comes from a person with "personal, real, and direct legal experience with the lawyer." A stranger who never hired you does not qualify.
- You disclose any payment or anything of value "plainly and prominently."
- The lawyer answers for false statements in the testimonial, even though a client wrote it.
A testimonial also has to pass the general rule. Rule 7.1(b) bars a communication "likely to create an unjustified expectation about results the lawyer can achieve." A client who writes "she won my case" has handed you a result claim. Rule 7.2(m) governs those: describe the type of case, and make the result "objectively verifiable." Our reading is that a testimonial reciting an outcome falls under both rules.
Reviews you did not shape
The Comment to Rule 7.2 draws a line. A client review the lawyer did not request, arrange, or shape "generally is not subject to this Rule." A review on the lawyer's own website, or one the lawyer can delete, must comply, and "the lawyer is responsible for its content." Copying your five best Google reviews onto your site moves them to the second group.
Paying for reviews
Two rules stop you from buying praise. Rule 7.2(h) bars paying or giving anything of value for a recommendation, apart from listed exceptions such as nominal gifts. The FTC's consumer review rule, 16 CFR 465.4, bars compensation or incentives "conditioned expressly or by implication on, the writing or creation of consumer reviews expressing a particular sentiment." A gift card for five stars breaks both.
Disclosure is a separate duty. 16 CFR 255.5 requires a material connection between endorser and seller, "including monetary payment or the provision of free or discounted products," to be disclosed clearly and conspicuously. 16 CFR 465.2 bars reviews or testimonials that misrepresent that the reviewer exists, used the service, or had the stated experience. A testimonial written by your staff in a client's name fails that test.
Actors and dramatizations
Rule 7.2(p) bars an actor or model portraying a client unless the role is "nonspeaking and merely background." Rule 7.2(n) requires a dramatization to say: "DRAMATIZATION -- NOT (THE) (AN) ACTUAL EVENT." A real client on camera needs neither. They do need to agree to it.
Client consent and replies to reviews
Rule 1.6(a) says a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation unless the client consents after consultation. Get that consent before you name a client in a testimonial. Replies need more care. Confirming that a reviewer was a client reveals something. Rule 1.6(b)(2) excepts a controversy between lawyer and client, but we found no Alabama source that settles how far it reaches for public replies. Keep replies general: "We take every concern seriously. Please call our office so we can talk privately."
Wording under a testimonial
A line that fits the rules: "Shared with the client's permission. No payment was given." Use it only when both statements are true. When you did give something of value, say what.
A lawyer not licensed in Alabama who directs a communication to prospective clients here must say so. That comes from the Comment to Rule 7.1 and Rule 7.2(b)(1), and it covers a testimonials page.
Sources
- Alabama Rule 7.2: (b)(1), (h), (l), (m), (n), (p), and the Comment on client reviews.
- Alabama Rule 7.1: (b) and the Comment on out-of-state lawyers.
- Alabama Rule 1.6: confidentiality of information.
- Supreme Court of Alabama order, May 13, 2025: the rewrite.
- 16 CFR 255.5 and 16 CFR Part 465: FTC endorsements and reviews.
Tell Google you'd like to see more of our posts in Top Stories.